Info
Monta is the best EV charging management software for most operators, AMPECO the most open to developers, and Driivz the strongest on certified OCPP 2.0.1 at network scale. ChargePoint, EV Connect, ChargeLab and Virta complete the list. All seven were compared on pricing, standards support, MCP and API access, and deployment.
Monta is the best pick for most operators in 2026. It is the only vendor here that prints its prices, and it is the only one with official MCP servers. Large networks that want open APIs should look at AMPECO next; operators that care about certified OCPP 2.0.1 at scale should look at Driivz.
EV charging management software is the back end that sits between your chargers and your drivers. It handles authorization, pricing, payments and power limits, and it speaks OCPP to hardware from different manufacturers. If your problem is the site's wider energy bill, our guide to energy management software covers that side, and operators with a fleet should read the fleet management software guide alongside this one.
Last updated: October 27, 2026. Pricing and feature claims were verified against vendor pages on that date.
EV charging station management software needs to fit the site as well as the charger. For EV charging management software for apartments, ask how resident access, shared capacity and billing are handled. When comparing an EV charging management system across properties, check who owns the operational data and how hardware can move between platforms.
Why You Need EV Charging Management Software
- One platform for mixed hardware. OCPP lets chargers from different makers report to the same back end, so you are not locked to the box you bought first.
- Revenue you can collect. Tariffs, payment processing, invoicing and roaming turn a charger into a billable asset instead of a cost center.
- Power that stays inside the limit. Load management shares a fixed grid connection across chargers, which can avoid an expensive service upgrade.
- Uptime you can prove. Remote diagnostics, firmware updates and fault alerts reduce truck rolls and give drivers fewer dead chargers.
- Access control that fits the site. Resident, employee, fleet and visitor groups can each get their own rules and rates, which matters in parking and multifamily sites. See our parking management software guide for the neighboring category.
How We Evaluated EV Charging Management Software
Each platform was scored on pricing transparency, standards support (OCPP versions and roaming), AI and MCP maturity, API openness and deployment flexibility. Facts come from each vendor's own pages; where a page would not load or a vendor publishes no figure, we say so. Full criteria live in our methodology.
1. Monta
Monta is a Copenhagen company that sells only to operators, and it is the rare charging vendor willing to print a price list. Its platform covers the back end (Monta Hub), a driver app and a control layer for energy.
Pricing: US Starter (up to 200 managed chargers) charges a $300 platform fee for the first year plus a 5% transaction fee. US Advanced (200+ chargers) is $5 per port per month for Level 2 and $10 for DC fast, a platform fee from $250 a month and a 4% transaction fee. The EU page lists euro prices (5 euros per AC socket, 8 per DC, platform fee from 500 euros, 2% transaction fee) that we have not converted. Add-on packages and volume discounts are quote-based.
Top Features
- Network monitoring with self-healing alerts
- Remote OCPP configuration and firmware management
- White-label driver app with roaming
- Billing, invoicing, wallet and tax handling
- Smart charging and energy management
- Monta AI for support and session analysis
Pros
- Published per-port pricing in USD
- Public API with OpenAPI specs and webhooks
- Open-source OCPP library and emulator
Cons
- Transaction fee sits on top of port and platform fees
- API rate limit of 1,000 requests per 10 minutes on Advanced
AI/MCP Integration: Official. Monta's developer hub lists three Monta-hosted MCP servers, one for its API, one for its knowledge base and one for its docs.
API Integration: Yes. Public docs at docs.partner-api.monta.com with OpenAPI specs, 14 webhook event types, OCPP 1.6J and 2.0.1, and native OCPI.
Cloud Based: Yes. No on-premise option is documented as of October 2026.
Platforms: Web dashboard, iOS and Android driver app; live in 14 countries. Monta's pages disagree on hardware coverage (600+ models on its API page, 900+ on its CPMS page).
Best For: Operators and small sites that want to know the cost before talking to sales.
Our take: Choose Monta when price clarity and developer access matter more than a bundled hardware relationship.
Editor score: 4.6/5. The only vendor with published pricing and official MCP servers, held back by stacked fees and a modest API rate limit.
See more in our facilities and workplace guides.
2. AMPECO
AMPECO targets operators scaling a network, and its pitch is breadth: standards, white-labeling and sub-operator tenancy in one platform.
Pricing: Custom-quoted. AMPECO publishes no price list, and its pricing page returns a 404.
Top Features
- Hardware-agnostic charge point operations
- Flexible tariffs, payments and invoicing
- White-label driver app and partner portals
- Roaming over OCPI and hubs
- Dynamic load management with OpenADR 2.0
- Partner and sub-operator management
Pros
- Public, versioned API docs
- Broad standards coverage including ISO 15118
- Multi-tenant design for partners and sub-operators
Cons
- No published pricing
- Aimed at operators, not single sites
AI/MCP Integration: None found. AMPECO's developer hub publishes an llms.txt index for AI agents, but that is not an MCP server.
API Integration: Yes. Docs and a versioned reference at developers.ampeco.com. Its supported-chargers page says integration tests cover OCPP 1.6 and 2.0.1, ISO 15118 and Eichrecht.
Cloud Based: Yes, on shared or dedicated cloud infrastructure. No on-premise option is documented as of October 2026.
Platforms: Any OCPP-compliant charger, a branded driver app, an ad-hoc web portal, operator back office and partner portals; global.
Best For: Charge point operators building a branded, multi-partner network.
Our take: Choose AMPECO when you will integrate deeply through the API and need the sub-operator model.
Editor score: 4.4/5. Excellent developer surface and standards coverage; no price and no MCP server cost it the top spot.
3. Driivz
Driivz is owned by Vontier, which announced the acquisition in February 2022, and it runs at the scale of utilities and fuel retailers.
Pricing: Custom-quoted. No public pricing; the only route on its site is a contact form.
Top Features
- Operations management with remote diagnostics
- Billing and roaming settlement
- Load, peak and demand-response management
- White-label driver app and web portal
- Reporting and analytics
- Roaming over OCPI, OICP and OCHP
Pros
- Public Open Charge Alliance certificate for its OCPP 2.0.1 CSMS
- Hardware-agnostic, 2,000+ charger models per its own page
- Named customers include EVgo, Shell, Circle K and Volvo Group
Cons
- Sales-led pricing
- API docs not public
AI/MCP Integration: None found.
API Integration: Yes, but no public developer docs. Driivz describes an API suite on its interoperability page. It states OCPP 1.6 and 2.0.1 certification, and its 2.0.1 CSMS certificate (tested by DNV, June 2023) is public.
Cloud Based: Yes, cloud-native. No on-premise option is documented as of October 2026.
Platforms: Hardware-agnostic, white-label apps and web portal; 35+ countries across North America, Europe and APAC. Its own page, last updated January 2026, cites 160,000+ public ports and 4.5M+ drivers.
Best For: Large operators, utilities and fuel retailers that want certified standards and proven scale.
Our take: Choose Driivz when OCPP 2.0.1 certification and network scale outweigh price visibility.
Editor score: 4.3/5. Strong, verifiable standards and scale; sales-led pricing and closed API docs keep it behind AMPECO.
4. ChargePoint
ChargePoint sells the whole stack, from chargers to cloud to its roaming network, and its software arrives as a CMS Suite of four cloud plans.
Pricing: Custom-quoted on its official CMS Suite page: Core, Professional, Enterprise and Enterprise Fleet carry no dollar figures, with 1 to 5 year terms and up to 10% savings. Per an Iowa state bid document, not confirmed on ChargePoint's site and possibly dated, per-port prepaid fees were $329 (1 year) to $889 (3 years) for a Commercial plan and $479 to $1,289 for Enterprise. A lower-cost Essential plan launched in October 2024 for small business and multifamily sites.
Top Features
- Real-time station status and reporting
- Hierarchical power sharing and load management
- Flexible pricing, payments and tap to charge
- RFID access control and driver groups
- Waitlist and roaming with other networks
- Fleet telematics and charge optimization
Pros
- Hardware, cloud, app and roaming from one vendor
- Manages third-party OCPP stations as well
- Scale: 406K+ activated ports per its own site
Cons
- API access is a paid add-on on every tier
- Public charging, advanced energy and fleet tools sit on higher tiers
AI/MCP Integration: None found.
API Integration: Yes, as a paid add-on. The Web Services API is SOAP with WS-Security (v5.1), and its docs are behind a login. ChargePoint cites 40+ integrations. It states "hundreds of OCPP compliant models" but no OCPP version, so the version is not documented as of October 2026.
Cloud Based: Yes, cloud plans only; no on-premise option is documented.
Platforms: ChargePoint's own Level 2 and DC fast stations plus third-party OCPP stations; web platform and iOS and Android driver app; US, Canada and Europe.
Best For: Operators who want one vendor to own the hardware, software and driver network.
Our take: Choose ChargePoint when a single contract and a large driver network beat open integration.
Editor score: 4.1/5. The most integrated offer here, but quote-only pricing and an old, paid API weigh on it.
5. EV Connect
EV Connect sells its Software+ platform alongside hardware and services, and it has been part of Schneider Electric since 2022 while still trading under its own name.
Pricing: Custom-quoted through a quote form. The only commercial detail published is that Schneider Charge Pro hardware includes a one-year Software+ subscription.
Top Features
- Management console for access, pricing and station health
- Reporting with BI export
- Time-of-use, group and subscription pricing
- Dynamic load management
- White-label driver app with an AI chatbot and live call center
- OCPI roaming and prebuilt integrations
Pros
- OCPP 2.0.1 certified (Core and Advanced Security), per its FAQ
- Hardware-agnostic, with 24/7 driver support
- Schneider Electric backing
Cons
- No published pricing
- No public API documentation
AI/MCP Integration: None found.
API Integration: The vendor says it offers open, standards-based APIs, but we found no public docs, so documentation is not publicly available as of October 2026. Its FAQ states OCPP 2.0.1 certification and support for 1.6 and later.
Cloud Based: Yes. No on-premise option is documented.
Platforms: OCPP chargers from many brands, sold preconfigured with Alpitronic, PowerCharge, Schneider Electric and ZEROVA units; web console and iOS and Android driver app; mainly North America.
Best For: Commercial, workplace and retail operators who want software, hardware and support from one provider.
Our take: Choose EV Connect when you want a certified, service-heavy package in North America.
Editor score: 4.0/5. Certified standards and full-service support, offset by closed pricing and API docs.
6. ChargeLab
ChargeLab is a Toronto company offering white-label management software that it mostly sells through resellers.
Pricing: Custom-quoted. Its pricing page says network services are bought through authorized resellers, and an Enterprise License exists for organizations installing hundreds of chargers in 12 months, with no price shown.
Top Features
- Self-serve charger onboarding over OCPP
- Time or kWh pricing with discounts
- Card payments with PCI compliance
- Power management with load balancing
- Monitoring, OCPP log diagnostics and firmware updates
- Access control and white-labeled apps
Pros
- SOC 2 Type II listed on its site
- REST API covering sessions, pricing and load profiles
- Reports built for utility rebate programs
Cons
- API docs gated behind a developer program
- Reseller-led sales
AI/MCP Integration: None found.
API Integration: Yes, a REST API, but docs are available only through ChargeLab's Developer Program. The OCPP version supported is not stated on its software page.
Cloud Based: Yes, a hosted dashboard. No on-premise option is documented.
Platforms: OCPP chargers (ABB, Delta, EVBox, Lite-On and Phihong are listed), white-labeled iOS and Android apps, a QR-scan web app and RFID; US and Canada.
Best For: Hardware makers and installers who need a white-label back end with a security attestation.
Our take: Choose ChargeLab when you are a reseller or installer packaging software with your own chargers.
Editor score: 3.9/5. A useful white-label option with SOC 2 Type II, held back by gated docs and no stated OCPP version.
7. Virta
Virta is a Finnish platform that serves both charge point operators and e-mobility service providers from one hub.
Pricing: Custom-quoted. Virta lists two packages, "Standard charging solutions" and "Modular solutions", with no fee numbers, and its API page says to contact sales.
Top Features
- Remote monitoring with unlimited organization hierarchy
- Custom, scheduled and loyalty tariffs with cross-border VAT
- Load, congestion and demand-response management
- AI automations that fix selected charger faults
- Insights and downloadable reports
- Driver payments, invoicing and managed roaming
Pros
- Covers both operator and e-mobility service provider roles
- Public docs site and changelog
- Built around European tariff rules such as AFIR and Eichrecht
Cons
- OCPP 2.0.1 is available as key functionalities through pilots
- No self-serve signup
AI/MCP Integration: None found. Virta's API page and llms.txt do not mention MCP.
API Integration: Yes, docs at docs.virta.global with a changelog. Most APIs are asynchronous pull APIs, and an OCPP data-streaming gateway is a pilot. Virta announced OCPP 2.0.1 key functionality in December 2024; full OCPP 1.6 support is probable but not stated on an official page we read.
Cloud Based: Yes. No on-premise option is documented.
Platforms: Web hub and an iOS and Android driver app; its Hub page claims 2,000+ charger models; multi-country with 9 site languages.
Best For: European operators that also act as roaming service providers.
Our take: Choose Virta when you run both operator and driver-facing roles across several European markets.
Editor score: 3.8/5. Complete European tariff and roaming coverage, but pilot-stage OCPP 2.0.1 and no published price.
Comparison Table
| Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Standout Feature | AI-MCP Support | API Integration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monta | Operators wanting published pricing | $300 first-year platform fee plus 5% (Starter) | Official hosted MCP servers | Official servers | Public REST with OpenAPI, 14 webhooks |
| AMPECO | Large multi-partner networks | Custom-quoted | Sub-operator tenancy and standards breadth | None found | Public versioned docs |
| Driivz | Utilities and fuel retailers | Custom-quoted | OCPP 2.0.1 certificate at scale | None found | Described, docs not public |
| ChargePoint | One-vendor hardware and software | Custom-quoted | Integrated hardware, cloud and roaming | None found | Paid SOAP add-on |
| EV Connect | Commercial sites in North America | Custom-quoted | OCPP 2.0.1 certified with full service | None found | Described, docs not public |
| ChargeLab | Installers and resellers | Custom-quoted | White-label with SOC 2 Type II | None found | REST, gated docs |
| Virta | European operators and eMSPs | Custom-quoted | Operator and eMSP roles in one hub | None found | Public docs, async pull APIs |
How to Compare EV Charging Software Companies
- Check the OCPP version in writing. Ask which of 1.6 and 2.0.1 your chargers will run and what the vendor has certified, not just claimed.
- Price the transaction fee, not only the port fee. A percentage on paid charging scales with your revenue and can outgrow a flat monthly charge.
- Test your actual hardware. Ask for the vendor's supported-charger list and a written statement on which smart-charging features your model supports.
- Read the API terms. Find out whether docs are public, whether access costs extra and what the rate limits are.
- Decide how much of the stack you want from one vendor. An integrated offer simplifies support; an open platform keeps hardware choices open.
- Confirm regional rules. European sites may need Eichrecht and AFIR compliance; US sites should ask about utility rebate reporting.
- Ask who owns the driver relationship. Some platforms bill drivers on your behalf, others hand you the data and leave billing to you.
What EV Charging Management Software Actually Costs
Only Monta publishes enough to compute a cost, so here are two worked examples from its US price list.
A retail site with 20 Level 2 ports sits on Starter, which covers up to 200 managed chargers. The platform fee is $300 for the first year. If drivers pay $12,000 over that year, the 5% transaction fee is $600, so the first year costs $900 in software fees.
A network of 250 Level 2 ports is on Advanced. Port fees are 250 x $5 x 12, or $15,000 a year. The platform fee starts at $250 a month, or $3,000 a year, so the fixed floor is $18,000. If drivers pay $500,000 in a year, the 4% transaction fee adds $20,000, for $38,000 in total.
The other six vendors do not publish rates, so a comparable estimate needs a written quote from each. Ask every vendor to price the same 250-port scenario so the proposals line up.
Final Thoughts
Monta wins on what a buyer can verify: a price list, a public API, OCPP 1.6J and 2.0.1, and the only official MCP servers in this group. AMPECO is the better pick if you want to build deeply on an open API and your network has partners and sub-operators. Driivz is the safer choice when certified OCPP 2.0.1 at utility scale matters more than seeing a price.
ChargePoint is the answer for operators who want one vendor to own everything, and it carries the cost of that in quote-only pricing and a paid, older API. EV Connect, ChargeLab and Virta each fit a narrower buyer: service-heavy North American sites, installers and resellers, and European operators with roaming roles. If your site also manages other connected equipment, see our IoT platform software guide, and for the wider building see facility management software.
