Info
Perdoo is the pick for most teams because it publishes a price at every tier and ships a first-party MCP server, WorkBoard is the enterprise answer with nearly 60 MCP tools and three named agents, and Weekdone is where a team of three starts for nothing. All seven were compared on pricing transparency, alignment depth, API access, and official MCP support.
Perdoo is the best overall OKR software in 2026 for teams of 20 to 500. It publishes real per-user pricing, its free tier is a working product rather than a trial, and it is one of three platforms here with a first-party MCP server. At enterprise scale WorkBoard takes the pick. Perdoo also doubles as the best OKR software for small business teams under five people, since its entry tier scales down cleanly rather than forcing an upgrade at low headcount.
Two structural changes should reshape any shortlist built before this year. Microsoft retired Viva Goals, stranding an installed base that arrived through Ally.io. And Quantive, previously Gtmhub, is now part of WorkBoard: its pricing URL redirects to workboard.com, and the WorkBoard footer lists Quantive as its trademark.
The third change is quieter. OKR tools were among the first business applications to ship real MCP servers, which makes sense given the data. Goal trees, owners, check-ins, and confidence scores are exactly the structured context an AI assistant needs to answer which key results slipped and who owns them.
Why You Need OKR Software
- Spreadsheet OKRs die in week three. The first quarter works because someone maintains the sheet by hand. The second does not.
- Alignment is invisible without a goal tree. Teams cannot tell whether an objective ladders up to anything until the hierarchy is drawn.
- Progress has to come from somewhere real. Manual percentage updates are guesses. A number pulled from Jira or a warehouse query is a measurement.
- Quarterly reviews need history, not snapshots. Confidence trends over twelve weeks say more about execution than a final score.
- Leadership wants one view, not fourteen decks. A live rollup replaces the reporting cycle that eats every quarter's last two weeks.
Related tooling sits in our performance management roundup and our project management software category.
How We Evaluated
Each platform was scored on published pricing rather than gated quotes, the depth of alignment and check-in mechanics, whether progress pulls automatically from source systems, and API and MCP maturity with official servers separated from community builds. Every price came from the vendor's own pricing page in August 2026, never from a review aggregator. Full criteria live in our methodology.
1. Perdoo
Perdoo splits into strategy, goals, and performance, and the Strategy Map separates it from cheaper trackers. You draw the strategic pillars first, then hang OKRs and KPIs off them, so every objective has a visible parent that is not just the next level of the org chart.
Pricing: Free covers up to 5 users at no cost. Premium is 8 euros per user per month billed annually with a 5-license minimum, and Supreme is 10 euros, with view-only licenses at 1.50 euros. Annual billing saves 10 percent against quarterly, and registered nonprofits get another 25 percent off.
Top Features
- Strategy Map linking pillars to OKRs
- OKRs and KPIs tracked side by side
- Weekly check-ins with confidence scores
- 1:1s, reviews, pulse surveys, and Kudos
- KPI Boards, private goals, and custom dashboards on Supreme
- 42 integrations including Snowflake and Power BI
Pros
- Publishes a real price at every tier
- Free tier includes the AI Assistant and AI Coach
- A strategy layer most OKR trackers skip
Cons
- API access and the MCP server both need Premium or above
- Jira and Asana integrations are held to the Supreme tier
AI/MCP Integration: Official. Perdoo lists an MCP server as an included Premium tier feature on its own pricing page and in its support center integrations list, connecting a Perdoo account to ChatGPT, Claude, or any MCP-compatible client. A separate community server built on Perdoo's GraphQL API sits on GitHub with 19 tools and no vendor support. An in-product AI Assistant and AI Coach ship on every plan including Free.
API Integration: Yes, from Premium upward. Perdoo documents API access alongside Zapier coverage of 5,000-plus apps, and the community MCP server is built on its GraphQL API.
Cloud Based: Yes, SaaS.
Platforms: Web application with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Google Sheets, Excel Online, and TV display outputs.
Best For: Companies of 20 to 500 that want strategy context above their OKRs without enterprise procurement.
Editor score: 4.6/5. Best combination here of published pricing, a usable free tier, and a first-party MCP server.
2. WorkBoard
WorkBoard rebuilt itself around agents rather than bolting them on, and the Enterprise Knowledge Graph is why that works. The graph holds org hierarchy, goal ownership, skills, teams, initiatives, and funding, so an agent asked about a slipping key result already knows who owns it.
Pricing: Not published. WorkBoard quotes through sales, and no tier list appears on the site.
Top Features
- Knowledge Graph spanning goals, people, skills, and funding
- Chief of Staff agent for OKR drafting and briefings
- Leadership Coach agent for 1:1 pre-reads and recognition
- Portfolio Analyst agent for initiatives and budget
- Scorecards, business reviews, and meetings
- Connectors for Teams, Slack, Jira, Salesforce
Pros
- Deepest agent tooling in the category
- MCP coverage extends beyond goals into meetings and reviews
- Portfolio and funding views pure OKR trackers lack
Cons
- No published pricing of any kind
- Scale and agent depth are wasted below a few thousand people
AI/MCP Integration: Official, and the most complete here. The WorkBoard MCP Server lets any MCP-compatible client including Claude, ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor connect to WorkBoard data and act on the user's behalf, exposing nearly 60 tools across OKRs, key results, KPIs, scorecards, meetings, business reviews, and action items. Three named agents are generally available to enterprise customers.
API Integration: Yes. WorkBoard groups data, analytics, and MCP as one platform capability and documents third-party connectors, though it publishes no standalone developer portal.
Cloud Based: Yes, SaaS.
Platforms: Web application with Microsoft Teams, Slack, Outlook, Jira, and Salesforce integrations.
Best For: Large enterprises running strategy execution and portfolio management on one system with agents in the cadence.
Editor score: 4.5/5. Ahead on agents and MCP breadth; the total absence of pricing keeps it off the top spot.
Weighing a portfolio-first purchase instead? See our PPM software roundup.
3. Mooncamp
Mooncamp's argument is configurability. The goal system is customizable down to the field level, which matters if your organization already has a working goal vocabulary. It publishes clean per-user pricing and keeps the entry tier genuinely usable.
Pricing: Essential is 7 euros per user per month billed annually and Professional is 10 euros, both with a 5-user minimum. Enterprise is custom quoted with a 100-user minimum.
Top Features
- Customizable goal system and field structure
- Goal tree view and custom dashboards on Professional
- Goal and OKR rules for enforcing process
- Check-ins with reporting on every tier
- SAML SSO, SCIM, and view-only licenses on Enterprise
- Jira, Excel, Google Sheets, Slack, and Teams integrations
Pros
- Published pricing on both paid tiers, five-user floor
- Configuration depth usually reserved for enterprise plans
- Salesforce integration from the Professional tier
Cons
- No API or developer documentation in published materials
- Enterprise tier jumps to a 100-user minimum
AI/MCP Integration: None documented as of August 2026. Mooncamp's pages describe no MCP server and no named AI features.
API Integration: Not documented. Mooncamp lists data integrations for Jira, Excel, Google Sheets, and Salesforce, but publishes no API reference as of August 2026.
Cloud Based: Yes, SaaS.
Platforms: Web application with Microsoft Teams and Slack integrations.
Best For: Mid-sized companies with a goal framework they want the tool to match rather than replace.
Editor score: 4.3/5. Excellent pricing clarity and configuration; the missing API and MCP story costs it.
4. Workpath
Workpath treats OKRs as one module inside a strategy-execution system covering KPIs, initiatives, and resources too. That framing shows up in the pricing model, where you buy modules rather than feature tiers.
Pricing: Not published. Workpath sells modular plans covering one, two, or three-plus modules from KPIs, Goals, Initiatives, and Resources, with Viewer, Standard User, and Analyst license types and a one-year minimum contract. Pricing depends on license mix, contract length, and modules purchased.
Top Features
- Strategy Hub linking strategy documents to execution
- Agent Hub with Strategy Consultant, Chief of Staff, Market Analyst, and PMO Lead
- OKR Generator and OKR Quality Checker tools
- KPI driver trees with automated updates
- Conversations with AI meeting summaries
- ISO 27001, TISAX, and GDPR on every plan
Pros
- Modular licensing lets you start with Goals only
- Four role-specific agents rather than one generic assistant
- TISAX certification matters to automotive and industrial buyers
Cons
- No published pricing on any module or license type
- Several AI skill sets are still in beta
AI/MCP Integration: Official. Workpath documents Connect API plus MCP for automating data flows and connecting internal systems or AI tools. The AI Companion is included on every plan, the Agent Hub offers chat and voice, and Program Lead, Consulting, and Analyst skill sets are described as beta.
API Integration: Yes. Connect API is documented for automating data flows into and out of the platform, alongside integrations for Power BI, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Azure DevOps, Excel Online, and Microsoft Planner.
Cloud Based: Yes, SaaS.
Platforms: Web application with Microsoft Teams, Jira, Azure DevOps, and Power BI integrations.
Best For: European enterprises needing strategy, KPIs, and initiatives in one governed system with certification requirements.
Editor score: 4.2/5. Strong enterprise product with an honest modular model, sold entirely behind a quote.
5. Lattice
Lattice sells Goals and OKRs as a standalone product rather than a feature buried in a review cycle. That is the right structure if HR owns your goal process, since the same seat also carries 1:1s, weekly updates, and feedback.
Pricing: Goals and OKRs is $8 per seat per month, Performance is $10, and Engagement is $4. Compensation adds $6 and Grow adds $4. There is a $4,000 minimum annual agreement, billed annually in USD only.
Top Features
- Cascading goals with configurable structure
- Progress updates and reminder notifications
- Salesforce and Jira integrations on Goals
- 1:1s, weekly updates, and feedback in every base product
- Analytics and an AI Agent across products
- Q and A boards for open questions
Pros
- Every base module carries a published per-seat price
- OKRs sit beside reviews and engagement in one employee record
- Goals product includes 1:1s rather than upselling them
Cons
- The $4,000 annual minimum prices out teams under about 40 seats
- No API or MCP documentation in published pricing
AI/MCP Integration: None documented as of August 2026. Lattice includes an AI Agent with every base product and AI Analysis and Trends in Engagement, but publishes no MCP server.
API Integration: Not documented. Lattice lists integrations with dozens of systems, but no public API reference appears in its published pricing content as of August 2026.
Cloud Based: Yes, SaaS.
Platforms: Web application with Salesforce, Jira, and HRIS integrations.
Best For: HR-owned goal programs where OKRs feed review, calibration, and engagement data.
Editor score: 4.1/5. Cleanest suite pricing here, held back by that annual minimum and a silent API story.
Comparing against a full people platform? See our HRIS and HRMS software roundup.
6. Peoplebox
Peoplebox prices by module too, with OKRs inside Performance Management rather than as their own line item. Its edge is syncing depth: goals update from Jira and Asana automatically, and employee data comes from Workday, BambooHR, Darwinbox, or SAP without a roster upload.
Pricing: Performance Management, which contains Goals and OKRs, is $8 per employee per month billed annually. Individual Development Plans add $3, Engagement $2, 360 Degree Feedback $8, and Compensation $5. The Nova AI hiring teammate is quoted on volume.
Top Features
- Cascading goals across company, department, team, and individual
- OKRs, KRAs, and KPIs in the same framework
- AI summaries of progress, blockers, and achievements
- Progress auto-sync from Jira, Asana, and Google Sheets
- Business review dashboards for monthly and quarterly cycles
- HRIS connectors for Workday, BambooHR, Darwinbox, and SAP
Pros
- Published per-employee price on every module
- Strongest HRIS connector list here
- Goal progress pulls from work tools rather than manual entry
Cons
- OKRs cannot be bought separately from Performance Management
- No API or MCP documentation in published materials
AI/MCP Integration: None documented as of August 2026. Peoplebox ships AI summarization across goal levels and a Nova AI agent for hiring, but publishes no MCP server.
API Integration: Not documented. Peoplebox lists 35-plus work tool integrations and four HRIS connectors, but no API reference appears in its pricing or product materials as of August 2026.
Cloud Based: Yes, SaaS.
Platforms: Web application with Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, and Asana integrations.
Best For: People teams wanting OKRs, reviews, and engagement priced module by module against a live HRIS feed.
Editor score: 4.0/5. Good modular pricing and the best HRIS syncing here; thin as a standalone OKR buy.
7. Weekdone
Weekdone is the cheapest honest entry point here, and the only one built around weekly rhythm rather than quarterly ceremony. Its PPP structure, meaning plans, progress, and problems, gives teams something to do every Monday.
Pricing: Free for up to 3 users with every feature included. From 4 users there is a 14-day trial, then paid pricing quoted through an on-page calculator by company-size band up to 500-plus. Weekdone publishes no fixed per-user rate and states annual billing saves 20 percent, or two months free.
Top Features
- PPP weekly planning alongside quarterly OKRs
- Conversations, Feedback, and Recognition workflow
- Top-down and bottom-up alignment views
- Company TV dashboards and custom reports
- Dedicated OKR coach and quarterly reviews included
- 1,500-plus integrations through Zapier
Pros
- Genuinely free and fully featured for three users
- OKR coaching is bundled, not sold as a service line
- Data stored in the EU with a DPA on request
Cons
- No fixed per-user rate is published anywhere on the site
- No strategy map or KPI board above the goal tree
AI/MCP Integration: None documented as of August 2026. Weekdone publishes no MCP server and no named AI features.
API Integration: Yes. Weekdone lists custom API access on paid plans with developer documentation at weekdone.com/developer, plus Slack, Microsoft Teams, Jira, Asana, Basecamp, and Google Tasks integrations.
Cloud Based: Yes, SaaS with data stored in the EU.
Platforms: Web and mobile applications with browser access and TV dashboard output.
Best For: Small teams and first-time adopters who need a weekly habit more than a strategy framework.
Editor score: 3.8/5. Best free tier and best coaching, shallowest platform above the goal tree.
Comparison Table
| Tool | Best For | Starting Price | Standout Feature | AI-MCP Support | API Integration |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perdoo | Companies of 20 to 500 | Free, then 8 euros per user monthly | Strategy Map above the goal tree | Official, Premium tier | Yes, from Premium |
| WorkBoard | Large enterprises | Quote only | Nearly 60 MCP tools | Official, broadest coverage | Yes, via connectors |
| Mooncamp | Established goal frameworks | 7 euros per user monthly | Field-level customization | None documented | Not documented |
| Workpath | European enterprise strategy | Quote only | Four role-specific AI agents | Official, Connect API plus MCP | Yes, Connect API |
| Lattice | HR-owned goal programs | $8 per seat monthly | Goals priced as its own product | None documented | Not documented |
| Peoplebox | People teams on live HRIS data | $8 per employee monthly | Auto-sync from Jira and Asana | None documented | Not documented |
| Weekdone | Small teams and first adopters | Free for 3 users | Weekly PPP rhythm | None documented | Yes, custom API |
More comparisons live in our project management and collaboration blog category.
How to Choose
- Decide who owns OKRs first. HR ownership points at Lattice or Peoplebox; leadership ownership points at Perdoo, WorkBoard, or Workpath.
- Check where progress data comes from. If key results cannot pull from Jira, Salesforce, or a warehouse, someone types numbers by hand by week six.
- Price the minimum, not the per-seat rate. Lattice's $4,000 annual floor moves the math more than a euro per user does.
- Ask which tier the API sits in. Perdoo gates it to Premium, Weekdone to paid plans, and three vendors document none.
- Separate official MCP servers from community builds. Perdoo has both; only one comes with support.
- Confirm the free tier is a product, not a trial. Perdoo and Weekdone offer real free plans; most competitors offer 14 days.
- Test the check-in flow with real managers. Adoption dies at the weekly update, not the kickoff.
What This Actually Costs
Take a 200-person company rolling OKRs out company-wide. Perdoo Premium at 8 euros per user per month annually is roughly 19,200 euros a year, and Supreme is 24,000, before the volume discount Perdoo says applies at scale. Mooncamp Professional lands at the same 24,000.
Lattice Goals and OKRs at $8 per seat is $19,200 a year, clear of the $4,000 minimum. Peoplebox Performance Management is the same $19,200, and adding Engagement at $2 brings it to $24,000.
WorkBoard and Workpath will not quote without a call, and both target far larger organizations. Weekdone is the outlier: three users cost nothing, and the calculator is the only way to learn what 200 would cost.
Final Thoughts
The common failure is not picking the wrong tool. It is picking one before deciding whether OKRs are a strategy mechanism or a performance-review input, because those answers lead to different halves of this list and the products barely overlap.
Perdoo takes the overall pick as the only platform publishing a price at every tier, shipping a working free plan, and providing a first-party MCP server. WorkBoard is the right answer above roughly 2,000 employees, where the knowledge graph and portfolio views earn their cost. Pick Workpath if certification and modular licensing matter more than a public price list. Pick Weekdone if the real problem is that nobody updates anything on Fridays.
The MCP finding is worth sitting with. Three of seven OKR vendors publish official servers, against zero in several adjacent categories we reviewed this year. Structured goal data is unusually good input for an AI assistant, and the vendors that noticed first are ahead.